May 2009, Times, they are a'changing
3D or not 3D that is the question!
Over the last months I have been observing from afar what a lot of ‘experts’ are calling the next ‘revolution in the entertainment industry’, but I can’t help thinking that we have been here before!
As the drive for cinema audiences becomes more competitive in the entertainment industry we are seeing studios and distributors trying to differentiate themselves in this media space and attract people to the Cinema. One interesting example of this is the re-emergence of the 3D film.
The 3D genre has been around almost as long as movies themselves. Would it surprise you to know the first attempt to commercialise 3D was back in 1922? The film was called ‘The Power of Love’ so this is not new. We have had resurgences of these phenomena in the early 1950 and then in the 1980 but none of these attempts to drive us to watch films through the bespectacled focus of 3D Glasses has worked up thus far.
In the whole history of 3D presentations, many ways to convert existing 2D images for 3D presentation have been tried, but none have survived. However with combination of digital source material and cost effective digital post processing a new wave of conversion products are now available and we may see the ‘3Ding’ of many old favorites on our screens again.
We are now seeing multiple films produced in 3D through different techniques such as InTru 3D and IMAX features filmed with the Reality Camera System. Some recent examples of this are ‘Monsters v Aliens’ from Dreamworks Animation’s (presented through what they term the first ‘InTru 3D) and ‘Jonas Brother’: The 3D Concert experience which is a Disney Digital 3D and in IMAX3-D release. So the studios are getting behind this indeed.
DreamWorks Animation’s Jeffrey Katzenberg expects there to be 12 to 18 3D feature films by 2010. So is this going to catch on? The authors view is that although digital distribution and digital projection systems enable this type of innovation, it is playing at the edges of the media and is one way of getting the audience to the Cinema rather than watching at home.
There are some attempts to create a 3D home market but this is difficult and would require you to effectively have two copies of the film on one disk (something we are not equipped for yet) or use a set of anaglyphic paper glasses--the kind with blue/red or green/red lenses—which are included with the DVD case. Not for me I am afraid.
This is another example of driving us, the audience, from a ‘broadcast media’ to a ‘narrowcast media’ recipient, where different formats and channels are segmenting the audience into small focused channel groups and the overall audiences for each of these techniques is in fact narrowing!
So back to my original question 3D or not 3D?….Not 4 me, see you in the next edition.